netfabb
Public opinion poll
Name*:
Company*:
Email*:
Installation:
 
How often have you used netfabb®
<5 times
monthly
weekly
daily
How experienced are you with
  STL Files no experience some good professional
  3D CAD no experience some good professional
  Mesh repair no experience some good professional
  Machine preparation no experience some good professional
Quality compared to other software for STL-
  Viewing no other software worse equal better
  Checking no other software worse equal better
  Repair no other software worse equal better
  Analysing no other software worse equal better
  File Organisation no other software worse equal better
  Machine preparation no other software worse equal better
Design and overall user interface
  General Design/looks bad ok good
  Easy to install bad ok good
  Suggestions:
Software
  Installation and set-up not tested bad ok good very good
  Value for Money not tested bad ok good very good
  Getting started not tested bad ok good very good
  Easy to learn not tested bad ok good very good
  Computation Speed not tested bad ok good very good
  Substitute other STL software with netfabb Studio no way coexistence in principle yes a must
General functions
  File preview browser not tested bad ok good very good
  Generation of primitives
not tested bad ok good very good
  Collision Control
not tested bad ok good very good
Mesh Edit
  Automatic file repair
not tested bad ok good very good
  Triangle marking
not tested bad ok good very good
  Hole fill not tested bad ok good very good
Would you ...
  recommend the software?
Yes No
  upgrade the free version?
Yes No
  buy the professional version?
Yes No
  substitude your STL software?
Yes No
  complement your STL software? Yes No
What are you missing in the free version
What would you miss in a paid version
Any idea for new functions you want to share with us?
Comment: